<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking to the UC Commission on the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://universityprobe.org/2009/11/speaking-to-the-uc-commission-on-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://universityprobe.org/2009/11/speaking-to-the-uc-commission-on-the-future/</link>
	<description>- a critical forum on Research Universities, their finances, their governance, ..., their future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Moravec</title>
		<link>http://universityprobe.org/2009/11/speaking-to-the-uc-commission-on-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Moravec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universityprobe.org/?p=561#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>$3 Million Reckless Spending by UCB Chancellor Birgeneau approved by UC President Yudof 
UC President Yudof has a UCB Chancellor that should do the high paidwork he is paid for instead of hiring an East Coast consulting firm to fulfill his responsibilities. ‘World class’ smart executives like Chancellor Birgeneau need to do the analysis, hard work and make the difficult decisions of their executive job!

Where do consulting firms like Bain ($3,000,000 consultants) get their recommendations? 
From interviewing the senior management that hired them and will be approving their monthly consultant fees and expense reports. Remember the nationally known auditing firm who said the right things and submitted recommendations that senior management wanted to hear and fooled government oversight agencies and the public? Consultants never bite the hand that feeds them

Mr. Birgeneau&#039;s executive officer performance management responsibilities include &quot;inspiring innovation and leading change.&quot;  This involves &quot;defining outcomes, energizing others at all levels and ensuring continuing commitment.&quot;  Instead of demonstrating his leadership capacity by fulfill his executive accountabilities, Mr. Birgeneau outsourced them.  Doesn&#039;t he engage University of California and University of California Berkeley (UCB) people at all levels to help examine the budget and recommend the necessary $150 million trims?  Hasn&#039;t he talked to Cornell and the University of North Carolina - which also hired Bain -- about best practices and recommendations that might apply to UCB cuts?

No wonder the faculty and staff are angry and suspicious.  Three million dollars is a high price for Californians to pay when a knowledgeable ‘world-class’ Chancellor is not doing his job.
Save $3,000,000 for teaching our students and request that the UC President motivate Birgeneau to fulfill his executive work accountabilities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$3 Million Reckless Spending by UCB Chancellor Birgeneau approved by UC President Yudof<br />
UC President Yudof has a UCB Chancellor that should do the high paidwork he is paid for instead of hiring an East Coast consulting firm to fulfill his responsibilities. ‘World class’ smart executives like Chancellor Birgeneau need to do the analysis, hard work and make the difficult decisions of their executive job!</p>
<p>Where do consulting firms like Bain ($3,000,000 consultants) get their recommendations?<br />
From interviewing the senior management that hired them and will be approving their monthly consultant fees and expense reports. Remember the nationally known auditing firm who said the right things and submitted recommendations that senior management wanted to hear and fooled government oversight agencies and the public? Consultants never bite the hand that feeds them</p>
<p>Mr. Birgeneau&#8217;s executive officer performance management responsibilities include &#8220;inspiring innovation and leading change.&#8221;  This involves &#8220;defining outcomes, energizing others at all levels and ensuring continuing commitment.&#8221;  Instead of demonstrating his leadership capacity by fulfill his executive accountabilities, Mr. Birgeneau outsourced them.  Doesn&#8217;t he engage University of California and University of California Berkeley (UCB) people at all levels to help examine the budget and recommend the necessary $150 million trims?  Hasn&#8217;t he talked to Cornell and the University of North Carolina &#8211; which also hired Bain &#8212; about best practices and recommendations that might apply to UCB cuts?</p>
<p>No wonder the faculty and staff are angry and suspicious.  Three million dollars is a high price for Californians to pay when a knowledgeable ‘world-class’ Chancellor is not doing his job.<br />
Save $3,000,000 for teaching our students and request that the UC President motivate Birgeneau to fulfill his executive work accountabilities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://universityprobe.org/2009/11/speaking-to-the-uc-commission-on-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universityprobe.org/?p=561#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Chris;

I agree on the need for such a &quot;Peoples&#039; Commission&quot;, since it is clear that the Commission created by the Regents is constrained to preserve so much of the management status quo. The challenge is to not just create and collect good analyses and proposals but to find the constituency that will push effectively for the needed changes.  Any suggestions on how we might do this? 
 - Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris;</p>
<p>I agree on the need for such a &#8220;Peoples&#8217; Commission&#8221;, since it is clear that the Commission created by the Regents is constrained to preserve so much of the management status quo. The challenge is to not just create and collect good analyses and proposals but to find the constituency that will push effectively for the needed changes.  Any suggestions on how we might do this?<br />
 &#8211; Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Newfield</title>
		<link>http://universityprobe.org/2009/11/speaking-to-the-uc-commission-on-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Newfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universityprobe.org/?p=561#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Charlie - this is a good comment.  There is a long history in the corporate world of attempts to move towards &quot;open book management&quot; and to improve struggling organizations around shared budgetary information and a massive increase in informed financial suggestions coming from frontline workers - staff, teaching and research faculty.  UCOF will not have the independence needed to study the problem and make suggestions.  Why not a multicampus, self-organized Transparency Working Group that would pool expertise, do research, and make concrete recommendations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie &#8211; this is a good comment.  There is a long history in the corporate world of attempts to move towards &#8220;open book management&#8221; and to improve struggling organizations around shared budgetary information and a massive increase in informed financial suggestions coming from frontline workers &#8211; staff, teaching and research faculty.  UCOF will not have the independence needed to study the problem and make suggestions.  Why not a multicampus, self-organized Transparency Working Group that would pool expertise, do research, and make concrete recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
